The Truth About Beauty Essay

The Truth About Beauty Essay.

The poetic saying emphasis the identity of beauty and truth. According to it. only truth represents beauty -- a fact which all human should take notice of in all their day-to-day thoughts, proclivities, human and social dealings, and works of art and science. There are such things as acted truths and acted lies and these have their impact in human life as important as those which arise from the spoken or the written word. Truth and falsehood are qualities that belong to the work of our hands, as well as words of our lips, and are often more eloquent to the eye than the word can be to ears.

They are expressed by our whole personalities, by our character, by our conduct, by our general conversation with our kith and kin, or friends in the world, and foes. Great truths are often communicated by works of art literature, sculpture, painting,cartoon, films or other effective media that permeates the human mind.

Every portrait painted is either a truth or a lie, or a mixture of the two. Its beauty depends on the degree of truth, and honesty dedicated in it. It also represents the character of the painter. An artist who puts his hearts and soul in his work, and applies tones of colour, themes and dedicated motifs, is able to produce a beautiful piece. If his objective is merely mercenary, simply to flatter the onlooker and paint for the sake of getting outward appreciation. in terms of more, his work cannot be called a piece of lasting beauty.

In social life, it would be quite futile and meaningless to state things of wisdom, religion, and all these, if they lack audience. If there is no real response, reception or desire to understand the profit by them. Launched into the empty space of the universe, with nobody to receive them, even beautifully notice doctrines or thesis may go waste.

We can never understand beauty as an isolated thing. self- supported, or hanging in the air. A thing of beauty always appears in a personal context. conditioned by the person who creates it, and for the persons or the era on which it is focused. In fact, beauty and truth, like arts .and science, form together a kind of common-wealth in which each serves the rest, and is, in turn, served by them. As we know all knowledge is one-all comprehensive and universal.

Truth is thing that is divine in nature, and its majesty would be affronted if we connect it too closely with our human lives. Some of us have, therefore, surrounded truth with a kind of theoretical idolatory, which has had to usual result of making both the idol and the idolator insignificant.

Truth is a beautiful operation, a dynamic thing which does its beneficent work in a personal and social context. On the other hand, a lie is an offensive operation, performed by one man upon other. It resembles robbery and theft. Just as rubbery' cannot be committed without a victim, so lies cannot be told without a victim to be deceived or beguiled. A lie is an offence against logic. It is an offence against the persons to whom it is addressed,

Whatever else truth may be, there is no doubt as to its being valuable, not merely in the sense that it is good to look at, but also it does good to those who see it, known it and act upon it. Truth is, in other words a value, not residing inertly in the personality that utters, it, or the work of art that expresses it. It operates rhythmically, making a difference for the better, to every mind which accepts it. On the opposite end is the lie that makes the personality of the teller, as well as of the listener, blurred.

The formost contention between truth and lie extends its dimension when we identify truth with beauty, as Keats so emphatically does in the quotation of this essay. All we do in this case is to change the name of the operating power. An idle beauty is no more conceivable than an idle truth. Indeed, beauty is never more falsely conceived than when we think of its as deserving to be looked at. People who look at beauty never see it. They see it when it operates upon them, moves them, stirs them, sentimentalises them.

Like Truth, Beauty is dynamic and vital; no wonder they look to be identical. That truth is beauty and beauty truth, is most significantly illustrated by the beauty that lies in the creative arts. The truth when depicted in a piece of art -- a painting, a poem, a musical lyric or a symbolic dance, become a personified beauty. The painter, the poet. the musician or the dancer, makes the truth so beautiful that it permeates the whole being of the viewer, the reader, the listener or the audience.

It spreads in the whole personality of each individual, his heart, brain, the hormones, the eyes and the ears. It not only inspires but also sentimentalises. It leaves a life-long impression on the mind, provided the audience is receptive and the message conveyed by the artists is infinitely true.

Essay On Truth is Beauty And Beauty is Truth

Essay On Truth is Beauty And Beauty is Truth.
The poetic saying emphasis the identity of beauty and truth. According to it. only truth represents beauty -- a fact which all human should take notice of in all their day-to-day thoughts, proclivities, human and social dealings, and works of art and science. There are such things as acted truths and acted lies and these have their impact in human life as important as those which arise from the spoken or the written word. Truth and falsehood are qualities that belong to the work of our hands, as well as words of our lips, and are often more eloquent to the eye than the word can be to ears.

They are expressed by our whole personalities, by our character, by our conduct, by our general conversation with our kith and kin, or friends in the world, and foes. Great truths are often communicated by works of art literature, sculpture, painting,cartoon, films or other effective media that permeates the human mind.

Every portrait painted is either a truth or a lie, or a mixture of the two. Its beauty depends on the degree of truth, and honesty dedicated in it. It also represents the character of the painter. An artist who puts his hearts and soul in his work, and applies tones of colour, themes and dedicated motifs, is able to produce a beautiful piece. If his objective is merely mercenary, simply to flatter the onlooker and paint for the sake of getting outward appreciation. in terms of more, his work cannot be called a piece of lasting beauty.

In social life, it would be quite futile and meaningless to state things of wisdom, religion, and all these, if they lack audience. If there is no real response, reception or desire to understand the profit by them. Launched into the empty space of the universe, with nobody to receive them, even beautifully notice doctrines or thesis may go waste.

We can never understand beauty as an isolated thing. self- supported, or hanging in the air. A thing of beauty always appears in a personal context. conditioned by the person who creates it, and for the persons or the era on which it is focused. In fact, beauty and truth, like arts .and science, form together a kind of common-wealth in which each serves the rest, and is, in turn, served by them. As we know all knowledge is one-all comprehensive and universal.

Truth is thing that is divine in nature, and its majesty would be affronted if we connect it too closely with our human lives. Some of us have, therefore, surrounded truth with a kind of theoretical idolatory, which has had to usual result of making both the idol and the idolator insignificant.

Truth is a beautiful operation, a dynamic thing which does its beneficent work in a personal and social context. On the other hand, a lie is an offensive operation, performed by one man upon other. It resembles robbery and theft. Just as rubbery' cannot be committed without a victim, so lies cannot be told without a victim to be deceived or beguiled. A lie is an offence against logic. It is an offence against the persons to whom it is addressed,

Whatever else truth may be, there is no doubt as to its being valuable, not merely in the sense that it is good to look at, but also it does good to those who see it, known it and act upon it. Truth is, in other words a value, not residing inertly in the personality that utters, it, or the work of art that expresses it. It operates rhythmically, making a difference for the better, to every mind which accepts it. On the opposite end is the lie that makes the personality of the teller, as well as of the listener, blurred.

The formost contention between truth and lie extends its dimension when we identify truth with beauty, as Keats so emphatically does in the quotation of this essay. All we do in this case is to change the name of the operating power. An idle beauty is no more conceivable than an idle truth. Indeed, beauty is never more falsely conceived than when we think of its as deserving to be looked at. People who look at beauty never see it. They see it when it operates upon them, moves them, stirs them, sentimentalises them.

Like Truth, Beauty is dynamic and vital; no wonder they look to be identical. That truth is beauty and beauty truth, is most significantly illustrated by the beauty that lies in the creative arts. The truth when depicted in a piece of art -- a painting, a poem, a musical lyric or a symbolic dance, become a personified beauty. The painter, the poet. the musician or the dancer, makes the truth so beautiful that it permeates the whole being of the viewer, the reader, the listener or the audience.

It spreads in the whole personality of each individual, his heart, brain, the hormones, the eyes and the ears. It not only inspires but also sentimentalises. It leaves a life-long impression on the mind, provided the audience is receptive and the message conveyed by the artists is infinitely true.

Essay On Slow And Steady Wins The Race

Essay On Slow And Steady Wins The Race.

We are told in one of Aesop's fables how the hare and the tortoise once agreed to run a race against each other. The swift footed hare ridiculed as preposterous the idea that he could possibly be beaten by his opponent. At the beginning of the race he started off at a great speed and soon left the tortoise far behind. Presently, looking round and finding that his adversary was out of sight, he thought he might as well lie down and have a sleep, and did so. Meanwhile the tortoise had been plodding steadily on.

After a long time he came up to the place where the hare was sleeping, and went on past his adversary until he was near the goal. At this point the hare, waking up, saw the tortoise within a few yards of the winning post. He made a desperate effort to get there before him but was unable to overtake him in time to save the race. The moral of the story is that steady perseverance is more successful than short outbursts of fitful energy.

We often see this truth illustrated in the competitions of students at schools and colleges, and in the severer struggles of later life. A young student of remarkable talents commence the year at college with a firm resolution to work fifteen hours a day and so outstrip all his competitors. For some time he keeps his resolution, until he begins to feel the exhaustion that is the natural result of his extravagant exertions.

He then begins to reflect how much he is in advance of other students, and thinks he may indulge in a rest to recruit his exhausted powers. The rest is so agreeable that he prolongs it until when he compares notes with his friends, he is astounded to find that those who have been working steadily for a moderate amount of hours every day. are now well in front of him.

In later life, also, we find as a generally rule, that steady persevering men produce greater results than those who work. however energetically, by fits and starts. It is doubtful, however, whether this rule can be applied to the majority of famous authors. No doubt many instances, even from this class of men, may be
quoted in its support.

Mr. Beckford at the age of twenty worked continuously for three days and two nights, at the end of which time he had finished the brilliant novel called Vathek. But he was punished for his neglect of the laws of health by a severe illness, and in the remainder of his long life produced no literary work of great value. Byron composed his finest poems with wonderful rapidity, while he felt under the sway of inspiration. But his poetry suffered: and all. critics are agreed that his poems would have been much finer than they are if he had the patience to perfect them by painstaking revision.

In the case of men of extraordinary and irregular genius, it is difficult to conceive that they could have produced greater works by binding themselves down to the observance of methodical rules in the distribution of their time. On the other hand there are other men of great talents, nay. of the highest genius, who, like Kant, the German metaphysician, have found that steady labour for a fixed number of hours every day by no means checked the flow of inspiration.

Essay On Manners Make the Man

Essay On Manners Maketh Man.In the 14th century, William of Wykeham, Bishop of Winchester, founded two great educational institutions -- New College, Oxford, and the great public school at Winchester. He gave to both the same motto: "manners maketh Man". In those days the word -manners" did not mean mere outward behaviour, as it doesthing that really matters in life was character.

mainly as moral training. In other words, he recognized that the only education as the mere getting of knowledge and mental training, but sound moral principles that makes a man. So he did not regard
now, but what we should call good conduct or morality. By his motto the wise Bishop meant that it is good moral conduct based on This begins so, moral education is all important. From their earliest years children must be taught the difference between right and wrong, and trained to love and follow what is right and hate and avoid what is wrong.

Such training means the formation of character on right lines. Its object is to bring children up in such a way that they will grow up to be truth-loving, honest, brave, pure-minded and unselfish men and women.
The home is the best school for moral education. Schoolmasters cannot get into such close touch with their pupils as can parents with their own children. Nor can they appeal to their love and affection as good fathers and mothers can. Moreover, moral education has to begin in the earliest years of the child, long before he can go to school. And these early years are the most important.

As a Roman Catholic Cardinal once said: "Give us the children up to seven years old, and you can have them the rest of their lives."

The methods of moral training are teaching, example and punishment. The child must be taught what is right by moral lessons, advice, warning; and he must be shown what is right by good example. So there is a great responsibility laid upon parents to live a good life before their children; for, example is better than precept. Only when teaching and example fail should punishment be resorted to; but it has it place in moral training.

At the same time, kindness, understanding and tact will often do more than punishment in keeping a boy straight. Sincere religion, too, is a great aid to morality; for one who had learnt to love and obey the good God wants to do right and the good. True religion was finely summed up by an ancient Hebrew prophet: "What doth the LORD require of the but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?"

Essay On Union Is Strength

Essay On Union Is Strength.One of Aesop's Fables tells a story of an old man who was troubled because his sons were always quarreling. He was afraid that the family would be quite broken up when he died. So one day he called his sons together, and showed them a bundle of sticks, and asked them to break them for him. They tired in turn, but thoughthey were strong, all of them failed. Then he untied the bundle and told them to break each stick by itself. This they did easily. In this way he taught them that union is strength. If they held together as one family, they would be strong; but if they quarreled and separated, they would be weak.

Take a football or hockey team. If the members of the team play together and help each other, they will form a strong team. But if they are split up into parties, when they play in a match some will play badly or lazily, because they are jealous of the others, and the team will lose the match.

Sometimes a school or a college is spoilt because the members of the staff, or the committee, are divided; and while they are quarreling, the work is neglected, and the college or school goes down. Often a whole town suffers, because those looking after the streets, buildings, hospitals, and water-supply, spend their time in calling each other names.

The same is true in war. A large army, whose officers hate each other and do not work together, has been beaten by a smaller united army. That is why the great French general, Napoleon, used to say, 'Divide and Conquer. "He own some of his great victories by attacking one of his enemies when alone before the others could come up to help, or he would weaken a whole nation by dividing it up into quarreling parties.
A united nation, a united family, a united society of any kind, is strong. United they stand, divided they fall. Their motto must be, One heart, one way."

The same is true is every field. If all the Muslims in the world are united, they are bound to make progress. They can also become a super power by unity. Muslims all over the world only need unity.

Essay On Two Sides To Every Question

Essay On There Are Two Sides To Every Question.There is a story told in verse about that curious kind of lizard called the chameleon. Two friends talking about it almost quarreled about its colour, one saying it was blue and the other swearing it was green. While they were arguing, a third man joined them and he said they were both wrong. He had caught a chameleon the night before, and it was black. All three went to see it; but when its captor took it out of the box where he had put it, lo! and behold it was not blue, or green, or black, but white!

• The explanation, of course, was that a chameleon has the stranger power of changing its colour to suit its surroundings. So at one time it may appear blue, at another green, at another black, and at another white. So all were right, and at the same time wrong.

In the same way truth is many-side and different people see different sides. so every question has at least two sides. Narrow- minded people can see only one side; and it take a broad-minded man to see both.
Consider the different ways in which different people will look at a social problem, say poverty. Some will say that poverty is entirely due to laziness, thriftlessness or strong drink. Let the poor work and save and keep sober, and there will be no more poverty.

 Other people will point out that idleness, thriftlessness and drunkenness are themselves the result of poverty -- the wretched circumstances in which the poor are brought up. So one party says. change the man and he will change his surroundings and the other says, change the surroundings and you will change the man. And then they quarrel and fight. Yet both are right; each sees one side of the question, but only one. A wise and broad-minded reformer will see both, and work both for the individual and for social reform.

Or, take politics. In most democratic countries there are two great parties, which correspond to the Conservatives and Liberals or Progressives in England. The Conservative wants to keep ("conserve") things as they are, fearing that any change will do more harm than good; the Liberal stands for reform, change and progress.

Now both are in a way right. Because no social organisation is perfect, we must reform abuses, adopt better methods, and progress to better things. But it has often happened (as in the French Revolution) that, if people are in too great a hurry to make progress. they destroy many good institutions with the bad, and even wreck the whole constitution. But narrow-minded politicians of different views do not see this; and so, each seeing only his side of they question, the fight. A real statesman sees both.